Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/122090Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Migliorini, Filippo | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Pilone, Marco | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Schäfer, Luise | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Vaishya, Raju | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Memminger, Michael | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Maffulli, Nicola | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-02-09T12:54:18Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2026-02-09T12:54:18Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2026 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://opendata.uni-halle.de//handle/1981185920/124038 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/122090 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Introduction Medial pivot total knee arthroplasty (TKA) was developed to reproduce native knee kinematics and improve function. Second-generation designs introduced refinements to enhance medial conformity and lateral rollback, but their clinical benefit remains uncertain. This systematic review compared outcomes of first- and second-generation medial pivot implants. Methods A comprehensive search of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Google Scholar was performed in August 2025 following PRISMA guidelines. Comparative and non-comparative studies reporting outcomes after first- or second-generation medial pivot TKA were included. Primary endpoints were Knee Society Score (KSS), functional subscale (KSS-F), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), WOMAC, Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), range of motion (ROM), and revision rates. Results Twenty-four studies including 4686 patients (3541 first-generation; 1145 s-generation) were analysed. Most baseline variables were comparable, though BMI, follow-up duration, and baseline WOMAC and ROM showed minor differences. At the latest follow-up, KSS, KSS-F, WOMAC, and FJS showed no significant differences. Revision rates were similar. OKS was slightly lower in the second-generation cohort (MD −2.5, p = 0.04), and ROM was greater (MD 4.6°, p = 0.01), but both fell below minimal clinically important difference thresholds. Conclusion First- and second-generation medial pivot TKAs achieved comparable outcomes and survivorship. Although second-generation designs showed statistical improvements in ROM and OKS, these were not clinically relevant. These findings suggest that while design refinements of second-generation implants may offer minor biomechanical advantages, they do not translate into significant improvements in patient-reported outcomes. Surgical decision-making should be based on the surgeon's experience, implant availability, and patient-specific factors rather than expectations of superior performance from newer designs. | eng |
| dc.language.iso | eng | - |
| dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | - |
| dc.subject.ddc | 610 | - |
| dc.title | Impact of implant generation on the outcomes in medial pivot total knee arthroplasty : a systematic review | eng |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| local.versionType | publishedVersion | - |
| local.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle | Journal of orthopaedics | - |
| local.bibliographicCitation.volume | 73 | - |
| local.bibliographicCitation.pagestart | 42 | - |
| local.bibliographicCitation.pageend | 49 | - |
| local.bibliographicCitation.publishername | Elsevier | - |
| local.bibliographicCitation.publisherplace | Amsterdam [u.a.] | - |
| local.bibliographicCitation.doi | 10.1016/j.jor.2025.12.007 | - |
| local.openaccess | true | - |
| dc.identifier.ppn | 1960378945 | - |
| cbs.publication.displayform | 2026 | - |
| local.bibliographicCitation.year | 2026 | - |
| cbs.sru.importDate | 2026-02-09T12:53:54Z | - |
| local.bibliographicCitation | Enthalten in Journal of orthopaedics - Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 2004 | - |
| local.accessrights.dnb | free | - |
| Appears in Collections: | Open Access Publikationen der MLU | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-s2.0-S0972978X25004817-main.pdf | 1.81 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |