Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/38690
Title: The effect of (poly)phenol-rich interventions on cognitive functions and neuroprotective measures in healthy aging adults : a systematic review and meta-analysis
Author(s): Ammar, AchrafLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Trabelsi, KhaledLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Müller, PatrickLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Bouaziz, Bassem
Boukhris, OmarLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Glenn, Jordan M.
Bott, Nick
Driss, Tarak
Chtourou, HamdiLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Müller, Notger GermarLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Hökelmann, Anita
Issue Date: 2020
Type: Article
Language: English
URN: urn:nbn:de:gbv:ma9:1-1981185920-389364
Subjects: Cognition
Neuroplasticity
Neuroinflammation
Polyphenols
Abstract: Context: As the food industry is continually involved in the development of new attractive alternative therapeutic agents, the evaluation of the beneficial impact of (poly)phenols on cognitive and brain function during aging has gained increasing interest. Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the acute and chronic effects of (poly)phenol-rich diet supplementation on cognitive function and brain health in aging adults. Data Sources: PubMed and Web of Science databases were searched for relevant randomized placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) published from inception to July 2019. Study Selection: Two researchers independently screened 4303 records, using the PICOS criteria: Participants were aging adults; Intervention was based on acute and/or chronic (poly)phenols-rich supplementation; Comparator was any comparator; Outcomes included cognitive function and neuroprotective measures; and Study design was RCTs. A third researcher was consulted when discrepancies arose. Fifteen high-quality (mean PEDro score = 8.8 ± 0.56) RCTs (total participants: 918 healthy older adults) were included in the final sample. Data Extraction: Information on study design, employed treatment, characteristics of participants, outcomes, and the correspondent assessing methods were extracted. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. Data Analysis and Results: A random-effects meta-analysis was used to pool estimates across studies. Effect size (ES) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated. Pooled results yielded a trivial ES (−0.2 to 0.03) for brain-derived neurotrophic factor and neuroinflammatory parameters and small (0.36) to moderate (0.82) ES for executive functions. Conclusion: This meta-analysis failed to provide evidence regarding the neuroprotective and anti-inflammatory effect of (poly)phenols supplementation in aging adults. However, findings from individual studies, included in this systematic review, suggest polyphenol-rich supplementation may improve some cognitive and brain functions in older adults. The beneficial effect of polyphenols seems to depend on ingested dose and bioavailability. Results suggest at least an intermediate dose (≥500 mg), and intermediate (≈9%) to high (43%) bioavailability rates are needed to cross the brain blood barrier and to exert a significant effect on cognitive health.
URI: https://opendata.uni-halle.de//handle/1981185920/38936
http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/38690
Open Access: Open access publication
License: (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons Attribution 4.0(CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
Sponsor/Funder: OVGU-Publikationsfonds 2020
Journal Title: Journal of Clinical Medicine
Publisher: MDPI
Publisher Place: Basel
Volume: 9
Issue: 3
Original Publication: 10.3390/jcm9030835
Page Start: 1
Page End: 25
Appears in Collections:Fakultät für Humanwissenschaften (ehemals: Fakultät für Geistes-, Sozial- und Erziehungswissenschaften) (OA)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Ammar et al._The effect of_2020.pdfZweitveröffentlichung1.47 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open